Chapter 7
Remedies for Right Infringement
Article 61
A trademark right holder may claim for damages from a person
infringing whose trademark rights, and may request for excluding
infringement thereto; in case of likelihood of infringement, the
said right holder may also request for the prevention thereof.
Using trademark under conditions stipulated by Paragraph 2 of
Article 29 without consent from a trademark right holder shall
constitute infringement of the trademark rights.
A trademark right holder, when requesting in pursuance with
provisions of the preceding paragraph 1, may request for destruction
or other necessary disposal of the goods infringing trademark
rights, or raw materials or equipments utilized for infringement.
Article 62
A trademark right infringement shall be deemed to have occurred
where consent of trademark right holder is absent from any of the
following conditions:
1. Knowingly using a trademark identical or similar to a well-known
registered
trademark of another person, or using the word(s) contained
in the said
well-known trademark as the company name, trade name or
domain name or
any other representation identifying the body or source of
whose business,
and hence diluting the distinctiveness or reputation of the
said well-known
trademark; or
2. Knowingly using the word(s) contained in a registered trademark
of another
person as the company name, trade name or domain name or
any other
representation identifying the body or source of whose
business, and hence
causing confusion to relevant consumers of goods or
services thereof.
Article 63
When claiming for damages, a trademark right holder may choose one
of the following methods to estimate the amount thereof:
1. Damages may be claimed in pursuance with Article 216 of the Civil
Code.
However, in the event where evidence cannot be presented to
prove the
damages thereof, the trademark right holder may use the
profit normally
gained from using whose registered trademark to subtract
the profit gained
from the same trademark after infringement, and claim the
difference as the
amount of damage;
2. Damages may be claimed in accordance with the profit gained from
trademark
rights infringement. However, where no evidence on costs or
necessary expenses can be proved by the infringer, the total
amount of
sales
from selling the infringing goods shall be regarded as the amount of
profit; or
3. Damages may be claimed in an amount equivalent to 500 to 1,500
times of
the unit retail price of the infringing goods. However, in
the case where over
1,500 pieces of infringing goods are found, the amount of
damage to be
claimed shall be assessed based on the total sale price of
the said infringing
goods.
A court may, at its discretion, reduce the amount of compensation in
the case where the amount of compensation for damages assessed under
the preceding paragraph is apparently unreasonable.
A trademark right holder may claim for additional compensation in a
reasonable amount in the case where whose business reputation has
sufferred any damage on account of such infringement.
Article 64
A trademark right holder may request for publication on a newspaper,
at the expense of the infringer, of the contents, in full or in
part, of the judicial decision in relation to a trademark
infringement.
Article 65
A trademark right holder may request the Customs Authority to
suspend the release of imported or exported goods that are suspected
of infringing the trademark rights of the said right holder.
The request set forth in the preceding paragraph shall be presented
in writing, explicating the facts of the infringement, and along
with a bond in an amount equivalent to the duty-paid price of the
imported goods or the F.O.B. price of the exported goods, assessed
by the Customs Authority, or with an equivalent security.
Once the Customs Authority accepts a request for suspension of
release, it shall immediately notify the applicant thereof; where
suspension of release is carried out owing to compliance to the
preceding paragraph, the said applicant and the party whose goods
are detained shall be notified in writing.
The party whose goods are detained may request the customs
authorities to revoke the suspension of release by providing a bond
in an amount equivalent to two times the bond set forth in the
preceding paragraph 2 or an equivalent security while following the
procedures in accordance with applicable customs regulations on
import and export goods clearance.
Without prejudice to the protection of the confidentiality of the
detained goods, the Customs Authority may allow the inspection of
the detained goods requested by the applicant thereof or the party
whose goods are detained.
Where the applicant thereof is awarded an affirmed court ruling
stating that the detained goods has infringed trademark rights, the
party of the detained goods shall be liable for all relevant
expenses incurred as a result of the delay of containers,
warehousing, loading, and unloading of the detained goods, except
for the conditions set forth in paragraph 4 of Article 66.
Article 66
The Customs Authority shall revoke the suspension of release under
any of the following conditions:
1. Where the applicant thereof fails to initiate litigation claiming
that the
detained goods are infringements in pursuance with Article 61
while notifying
the Customs Authority within twelve (12) days counting from
the date on
which the Customs Authority has notified its acceptance of
suspension
requested by the said applicant thereof.
2. Where a court ruling dismissing litigation initiated by the
applicant thereof
alleging that the detained goods are infringements becomes
affirmative.
3. Where a court ruling sustaining that the detained goods infringe
no
trademark rights becomes affirmative.
4. Where the applicant thereof requests for revocation of the
suspension of
release.
5. One that complies with the condition set forth in paragraph 4 of
Article 65.
The Customs Authority may extend the period set forth in Item (1) of
the preceding paragraph by an additional twelve (12) days whenever
necessary.
Where revocation carried out in pursuance with paragraph 1, the
Customs Authority shall follow the procedures in accordance with
applicable customs regulations on import and export goods clearance.
Where suspension of release is revoked in pursuance with Items (1)
to (4) of paragraph 1, the applicant thereof shall be liable for all
relevant expenses incurred as a result of the delay of containers,
warehousing, loading, and unloading of the detained goods.
Article 67
When the detained goods are affirmed to be non-infringing by a court
ruling, the applicant for suspension of release shall compensate the
party whose goods were detained for any losses resulting from the
suspension of release or from the provision of the bond set forth in
paragraph 4 of Article 65.
The applicant of the bond set forth in paragraph 4 of Article 65, or
the party, whose goods were detained, of the bond stipulated in
paragraph 2 of Article 65 shall enjoy the same right as a pledgee.
However, all relevant expenses incurred due to the delay of
containers, warehousing, loading, and unloading of the detained
goods as set forth in paragraph 4 of Article 66 and paragraph 6 of
Article 65 shall be paid in priority from compensation over all
losses incurred to the said applicant or the said party.
Under any of the following circumstances, the Customs Authority
shall return the bond set forth in paragraph 2 of Article 65 upon
request by the applicant thereof:
1. Where the bond is no longer required owing to the applicant
thereof has
either obtained a favorable affirmed judgment or reached a
settlement with
the party whose goods were detained;
2. Where the applicant thereof proves that the party of the detained
goods
was notified but has failed to exercise its rights within
twenty (20) or more
days after the suspension of release is revoked on account of
any
circumstances set forth in Items (1) through (4) of paragraph
1 of Article 66
in which the party of the detained goods has suffered from
losses owing to
the suspension of release, or after the party of the detained
goods has been
awarded a favorable affirmed judgment; or
3. Where the party whose goods were detained agrees to the return of
the
bond.
Under any of the following circumstances, the Customs Authority
shall return the bond set forth in paragraph 4 of Article 65, upon
request by the party whose goods were detained:
1. Where the bond is no longer required owing to either the
suspension of the
release order has been revoked pursuant to the provisions
of Items (1)
through (4) of paragraph 1 of Article 66, or the party whose
goods were
detained has reached a settlement with the applicant thereof;
2. Where the party whose goods were detained proves that the
applicant
thereof was notified but has failed to exercise its rights
within twenty (20)
or more days after the said applicant thereof has been
awarded a favorable
affirmed judgment; or
3. Where the applicant thereof agrees to the return of the bond.
Article 68
The regulations governing the application for detaining goods,
revocation of a detaining, inspection of detained goods, payment,
provision and return procedures for a bond or security, required
documents and other matters to be abided by which set forth in the
preceding three articles shall be prescribed by the competent
authority and the Ministry of Finance.
Article 69
The provisions of this Chapter shall apply mutatis mutandis to
infringement on the right to use a trademark granted through
licensing as provided under Article 33.
Article 70
A foreign juristic person or entity, which is not limited to those
recognized by the Government of the Republic of China, may also file
a complaint, initiate a private prosecution, or institute a civil
suit with respect to the matters prescribed in this Act.
Article 71
A court may establish a special tribunal or designate a specialist(s)
to handle trademark litigation.
Chapter 8
Certification Marks, Collective Membership Marks and Collective
Trademarks
Article 72
Any person who wishes to exclusively use a mark to certify the
characteristics, quality, precision, place of origin or other
matters of another person's goods or services shall apply for
certification mark registration.
Only a juristic person, an organization or a government agency which
is capable of certifying another person's goods or services shall be
eligible to apply for certification mark registration.
An applicant of the preceding paragraph who engages in business in
connection with the goods or services to be certified shall not
apply for certification mark registration thereof.
Article 73
The use of a certification mark shall connote that the right holder
of a certification mark, in order to certify the characteristics,
quality, precision, origin or other matters of another person's
goods or services, agrees the said person to indicate the said
certification mark on articles or documents in connection with the
said goods or services.
Article 74
Any business association, social organization, or any other group
that exists as a juristic person and wishes to exclusively use a
mark to identify its organization or membership shall apply for
collective membership mark registration.
An application for collective membership mark registration of the
preceding paragraph shall be filed with the Registrar Office by
submitting in writing specifying relevant matters along with a set
of articles governing the use of the collective membership mark
thereto.
Article 75
The use of a collective membership mark shall connote the indication
of such mark on relevant articles or documents by the organization
or its members in order to identify an organization or membership
thereof.
Article 76
Any business association, social organization, or any other group
that exists as a juristic person and wishes to exclusively use a
mark to identify the goods or services provided by its members, and
therefore distinguishing these goods or services from those provided
by others, may apply for collective trademark registration.
An application for collective trademark registration of the
preceding paragraph shall be filed with the Registrar Office by
submitting in writing specifying the designated class(es) and the
name(s) of goods or services along with the a set of articles
governing the use of the collective trademark thereto.
Article 77
The use of a collective trademark shall connote that, in order to
identify the goods or services provided by members of an
organization, the said members use the collective trademark on their
goods or services whereby these goods or services may be
distinguished from those provided by others.
Article 78
The right of a certification mark, a collective membership mark or a
collective trademark shall not be assigned or licensed to another
person for use, nor may it be the subject of a pledge. However, the
aforementioned shall not apply in the case where such assignment or
license to another person for use is unlikely to damage the
interests of consumers, to contravene fair competition, and has been
approved by the Registrar Office.
Article 79
The Registrar Office shall, upon request by any person or ex
officio, revoke the registration of a certification mark, a
collective membership mark or a collective trademark in the case
where misuse of which by the right holder or the licensed user
thereof has caused damages to another person or the public.
The term, misuse, referred to in the preceding paragraph shall
connote any of the following conditions:
1. Where a certification mark is used as a trademark or indicated on
articles or
documents in connection with the goods or services provided
by the right
holder of the said certification mark;
2. Where the use of a collective membership mark or collective
trademark has
misled the general public regarding the nature of the
organization thereof;
3. Where assignment, licensing, or creation of pledge is established
in violation
of the provisions of the preceding article;
4. One that has violated the set of articles governing the use
thereof; or
5. One that is misused in other means.
Article 80
Unless otherwise provided in this Chapter, the provisions of this
Act regarding trademarks shall apply mutatis mutandis to
certification marks, collective membership marks or collective
trademarks.
Chapter 9
PENALTY
Article 81
Any person who commits any of the following acts without prior
consent of the trademark or the collective trademark right holder
thereof shall be charged with imprisonment for no more than three
years, detention and, in addition thereto or in lieu thereof, a fine
of no more than NT$200,000:
1. One who uses a mark identical to a registered trademark or
collective
trademark on the same goods or services;
2. One who uses a mark identical to a registered trademark or
collective
trademark on similar goods or services, and hence has
caused likelihood of
confusion or misleading to relevant consumers;
3. One who uses a trademark that is similar to a registered
trademark or
collective trademark on the identical or similar goods or
services, and hence
has caused likelihood of confusion to relevant consumers.
Article 82
Any person, who knowingly sells, displays for sale, exports or
imports the goods referred to in the preceding article, shall be
charged with imprisonment of no more than one year, detention, and,
in addition thereto or in lieu thereof, a fine of no more than
NT$50,000.
Article 83
The goods manufactured, sold, displayed, exported or imported by, or
the articles or documents in connection with provision of services
by, a person committing any of the offenses as specified in the
preceding two articles, shall be confiscated, regardless of whether
such goods, articles or documents belong to the offender. |